H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Florencia Labat vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 2-2

Florencia Labat and Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1996 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-2.

ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #47 6-2 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Aug 28, 1996* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Florencia Labat #42 6-2 7-5 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data May 21, 1993* R16 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-4 4-6 6-3 Florencia Labat #92 Match data Aug 29, 1990* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-0 6-7 6-2 Florencia Labat #93 Match data Aug 16, 1990* R32 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florencia Labat — #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,083 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florencia Labat Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,803 0 2
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,873 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,845 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,976 0 3
19 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,975 0 4
20 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,813 0 4
22 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,781 0 0 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 2000 8–10 44.4% — 1,609 0 0 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florencia Labat Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florencia Labat Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.02
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1804 135.2 — — — — -9 -131 -222 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.43
15 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.15 1982 1873 149.1 — — — — -69 -6 -216 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -3.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1846 139.3 — — — — -46 +102 -186 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +2.67
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1852 137.3 — — — — -38 +58 -144 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.53
18 1989 1546 111.0 — — — — +36 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.39 1985 1977 159.0 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -3.00
19 1990 1573 118.8 — — — — +21 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08 1986 1975 158.0 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.48
20 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64 1987 1904 131.1 — — — — +36 +49 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 +0.21
21 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +21 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14 1988 1813 123.2 — — — — +53 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.28
22 1993 1763 141.4 — — — — -21 +6 -161 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64 1989 1789 141.3 — — — — +18 +110 -21 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.18
23 1994 1788 140.0 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06 1990 1698 132.3 — — — — +66 +103 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 1995 1781 133.8 — — — — -27 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32 1991 1590 119.8 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -47 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20 1992 1586 115.3 — — — — -4 +158 +154 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +6 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -56 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +26 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.11 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 1999 1621 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 2000 1610 110.7 — — — — +26 +27 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -33 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
Career — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.34 — 2083 146.0 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.