H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1
Florencia Labat holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1998 Indian Wells second round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1997* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 1-0 (ret.) | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Florencia Labat | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |