H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Manon Bollegraf H2H: 2-1
Florencia Labat holds a 2–1 lead over Manon Bollegraf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Manon Bollegraf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1995 US Open second round 7-5 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1991* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 6-3 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
| May 26, 1990* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Manon Bollegraf | 6-1 7-6 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Manon Bollegraf | #649 | #29 | 34 | 1,783 | 96 | 120 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Manon Bollegraf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #117 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #44 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #160 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |