H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 0-1
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 1–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1995 Jakarta fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1995* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Florencia Labat | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |