H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Florencia Labat vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1996 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-2 6-0 Florencia Labat #61 Match data
Mar 24, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #13 6-2 4-6 6-4 Florencia Labat #44 Match data
Nov 9, 1990* Worcester WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #5 6-1 6-3 Florencia Labat #119 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florencia Labat Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —