H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-1
Florencia Labat and Mercedes Paz are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 1–0 on clay, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1996 Canadian Open second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1996* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-1 6-1 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1990* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 7-5 6-3 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |