H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 3–2 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1997 Luxembourg round of 32 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 6-4 6-4 | Florencia Labat | Match data | Oct 23, 1997* | R32 | Luxembourg | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Florencia Labat | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Naoko Sawamatsu | Match data | May 18, 1995* | R32 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 7-5 7-5 | Florencia Labat | Match data | Apr 24, 1994* | F | Singapore Tennis Open | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Florencia Labat | Match data | Apr 9, 1994* | QF | Tokyo Japan Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Florencia Labat | 1-6 7-6 6-2 | Naoko Sawamatsu | Match data | Mar 18, 1991* | R32 | Key Biscayne | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,867 | 191 | 184 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,970 | 183 | 129 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #24 | 1,856 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #38 | 1,811 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,780 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,849 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #106 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1990 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 1991 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1994 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1995 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1998 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1997 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 106 | 84 | 190 | 55.8% | 66 | 73 | 139 | 47.5% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | — | 117 | 77 | 194 | 60.3% | 36 | 27 | 63 | 57.1% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1986 | 1483 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1477 | 96.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.30 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1669 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 62.5% | +0.77 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–1 (83%) | 110.2 | +1.75 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1546 | 110.9 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +1 | — | 47.4% | -0.61 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–0 (100%) | 105.8 | +1.52 | 1991 | 1724 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -44 | -170 | 55.4% | +0.49 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–1 | — | +2.14 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1573 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -15 | — | 42.5% | -0.55 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.5 | +1.08 | 1992 | 1857 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -155 | -248 | 60.7% | +0.42 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.0 | -0.25 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1671 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -1 | — | 48.8% | -0.15 | 8–2 (80%) | 2–3 (40%) | 106.9 | -0.64 | 1993 | 1853 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | -68 | -33 | -152 | 62.1% | +0.86 | 7–6 (54%) | 2–0 | — | +0.17 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1730 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -68 | — | 50.6% | +0.11 | 6–7 (46%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 1994 | 1871 | 146.2 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -58 | -130 | 60.7% | +1.00 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.5 | -0.99 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1762 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +7 | -160 | 56.0% | +0.68 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.9 | -1.64 | 1995 | 1848 | 150.6 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -74 | -92 | 58.6% | +0.48 | 10–7 (59%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.1 | +1.09 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1788 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | — | -123 | 58.3% | +0.54 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–4 (50%) | 106.0 | -0.06 | 1996 | 1812 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +4 | -6 | 53.2% | +0.02 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.8 | -0.27 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1781 | 133.7 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +8 | — | 50.8% | +0.17 | 6–3 (67%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.32 | 1997 | 1850 | 153.6 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -92 | -62 | 54.0% | +0.35 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 103.9 | -1.59 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1772 | 142.8 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -66 | -49 | 57.0% | +0.70 | 9–7 (56%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.20 | 1998 | 1721 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -25 | +64 | 40.5% | -0.62 | 8–6 (57%) | 1–1 | — | -0.88 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1675 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +54 | +73 | 48.1% | -0.17 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.2 | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 1656 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -6 | +31 | 40.8% | -0.83 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 1620 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -10 | — | 35.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 1609 | 110.7 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +28 | — | 45.2% | -0.74 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 102.8 | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1868 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -5 | -37 | 49.9% | -0.02 | 67–55 (55%) | 38–29 (57%) | 106.9 | +0.39 | — | 1971 | 148.7 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -58 | -103 | 56.1% | +0.40 | 67–48 (58%) | 31–18 (63%) | 109.3 | +0.47 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 22, 1998 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 29, 1997 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 23, 2000 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 27, 1998 | H2H |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | 0 | 10 | 10 | Sep 25, 1998 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 2, 1996 | H2H |
| Silvia Farina Elia | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 13, 1998 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 10, 1997 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 7, 1997 | H2H |