H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-1
Florencia Labat and Natalia Medvedeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1993 Schenectady third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |