H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Florencia Labat vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 2-2

Florencia Labat and Nicole Bradtke are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1996 Oklahoma third round 6-0 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Florencia Labat #33 6-0 4-6 7-5 Nicole Bradtke #41 Match data
Jan 5, 1995* Jakarta WTA 250 R32 Hard Florencia Labat #37 2-6 6-2 6-4 Nicole Bradtke #152 Match data
Jan 8, 1992* Sydney WTA 500 R64 Hard Nicole Bradtke #31 1-6 7-6 6-1 Florencia Labat #59 Match data
Aug 24, 1991* Schenectady WTA 250 QF Hard Nicole Bradtke #61 7-5 6-3 Florencia Labat #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florencia Labat Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —