H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Florencia Labat vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1

Florencia Labat and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on carpet, while Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1996 Canadian Indoor round of 16 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #52 7-5 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Oct 25, 1996* R16 Canadian Indoor Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-1 7-6 Florencia Labat #28 Match data Aug 31, 1994* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florencia Labat Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florencia Labat Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florencia Labat Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1989 1546 110.9 — — — — +37 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1990 1573 118.7 — — — — +20 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +20 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1993 1762 141.4 — — — — -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1994 1788 139.9 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1995 1781 133.7 — — — — -26 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 1999 1620 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 2000 1609 110.7 — — — — +27 +28 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.