H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 3–1 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1999 Berlin Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-3 6-1 | Florencia Labat | Match data | May 12, 1999* | R64 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-2 7-5 | Florencia Labat | Match data | Jan 25, 1998* | R32 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 7-5 6-3 | Florencia Labat | Match data | May 2, 1997* | R16 | Hamburg Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Florencia Labat | 6-4 6-3 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data | Mar 10, 1995* | R16 | Delray Beach | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,867 | 191 | 184 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,960 | 186 | 182 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,780 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #106 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1993 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1994 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1995 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1998 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1997 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1999 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1998 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2000 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1999 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 2000 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 106 | 84 | 190 | 55.8% | 66 | 73 | 139 | 47.5% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | — | 62 | 75 | 137 | 45.3% | 95 | 64 | 159 | 59.7% | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | 10 | 27 | 37 | 27.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1986 | 1483 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1546 | 110.9 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +1 | — | 47.4% | -0.61 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–0 (100%) | 105.8 | +1.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1573 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -15 | — | 42.5% | -0.55 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.5 | +1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1671 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -1 | — | 48.8% | -0.15 | 8–2 (80%) | 2–3 (40%) | 106.9 | -0.64 | 1993 | 1584 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -73 | +68 | +30 | 45.8% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.1 | +0.86 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1730 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -68 | — | 50.6% | +0.11 | 6–7 (46%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 1994 | 1590 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | -94 | +83 | — | 44.1% | -0.53 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–5 (0%) | 94.7 | +0.90 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1762 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +7 | -160 | 56.0% | +0.68 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.9 | -1.64 | 1995 | 1663 | 135.9 | — | — | — | — | -137 | +102 | — | 51.9% | +0.39 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–1 (83%) | 102.1 | +0.99 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1788 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | — | -123 | 58.3% | +0.54 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–4 (50%) | 106.0 | -0.06 | 1996 | 1846 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -211 | +41 | -120 | 59.3% | +0.43 | 16–5 (76%) | 9–2 (82%) | 115.9 | +0.11 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1781 | 133.7 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +8 | — | 50.8% | +0.17 | 6–3 (67%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.32 | 1997 | 1778 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | -116 | +159 | +33 | 55.0% | +0.30 | 15–10 (60%) | 6–4 (60%) | 106.6 | +0.55 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1772 | 142.8 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -66 | -49 | 57.0% | +0.70 | 9–7 (56%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.20 | 1998 | 1696 | 144.6 | — | — | — | — | -43 | +199 | — | 46.9% | -0.16 | 4–10 (29%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.4 | -0.86 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1675 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +54 | +73 | 48.1% | -0.17 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.2 | +1.02 | 1999 | 1832 | 151.2 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +71 | -133 | 55.6% | +0.52 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–5 (44%) | 103.8 | -0.42 |
| 27 | 1998 | 1656 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -6 | +31 | 40.8% | -0.83 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | +0.12 | 2000 | 1672 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +196 | +97 | 48.1% | -0.24 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.6 | -1.14 |
| 28 | 1999 | 1620 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -10 | — | 35.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.60 | 2001 | 1543 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +72 | +132 | +197 | 37.3% | -0.58 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–5 (17%) | 91.5 | +0.37 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1609 | 110.7 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +28 | — | 45.2% | -0.74 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 102.8 | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1511 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1505 | 112.3 | +1.16 | +0.66 | 0.673 | 41.2% | +91 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.63 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.20 |
| Career | — | 1868 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -5 | -37 | 49.9% | -0.02 | 67–55 (55%) | 38–29 (57%) | 106.9 | +0.39 | — | 1960 | 141.7 | +1.16 | +0.66 | 0.673 | 41.2% | -80 | +118 | +9 | 50.4% | +0.05 | 64–61 (51%) | 38–33 (54%) | 105.1 | +0.35 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 22, 1998 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 29, 1997 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 23, 2000 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 27, 1998 | H2H |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jan 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 3, 2003 | H2H |
| Iva Majoli | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 9, 2001 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 10, 2001 | H2H |
| Magdalena Grzybowska | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jul 13, 2000 | H2H |