H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Sabine Hack H2H: 2-2
Florencia Labat and Sabine Hack are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 2–0 on clay, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1996 Auckland quarterfinal 6-2 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1996* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 1-6 7-6 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Florencia Labat | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1993* | Curitiba | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-2 6-0 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1993* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-4 7-5 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |