H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 1-2
Yayuk Basuki holds a 2–1 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Yayuk Basuki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1999 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
| May 1, 1994* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 6-4 3-6 7-6 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Yayuk Basuki | 6-2 6-2 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |