H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Florenta Mihai vs Kate Brasher H2H: 0-1

Kate Brasher holds a 1–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Kate Brasher won the 1981 Ilkley 1 final 6-4 6-4.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Brasher 6-4 6-4 Florenta Mihai Match data Mar 5, 1981* F Ilkley 1 WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florenta Mihai 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kate Brasher 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florenta Mihai Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,465 0 0
15 1978 7–7 50.0% 1,493 0 0
16 1979 0–4 0.0% 1,440 0 0
17 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,481 0 0
18 1974 3–2 60.0% 1,515 0 0 1981 29–16 64.4% 1,622 0 2
19 1975 4–5 44.4% 1,508 0 0 1982 25–11 69.4% 1,638 0 4
20 1976 13–16 44.8% 1,634 0 0 1983 3–5 37.5% 1,612 0 6
21 1977 16–13 55.2% 1,774 0 1 1984 1–2 33.3% 1,584 0 6
22 1978 7–20 25.9% 1,642 0 1 1985 0–3 0.0% 1,530 0 6
23 1979 7–9 43.8% 1,615 0 1
24 1980 7–9 43.8% 1,578 0 1
25 1981 30–13 69.8% 1,652 0 3
26 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,618 0 3
27 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,624 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florenta Mihai Kate Brasher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1977 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1979 0 3 3 0.0%
17 1980 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1976 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1981 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 17 18 35 48.6% 5 17 22 22.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florenta Mihai Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1976 1481 96.5 0.0% -3.00 +0.46
14 1977 1466 99.5 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 +0.25
15 1978 1493 109.5 +17 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.65
16 1979 1440 92.3 +18 0.0% -3.17 +0.70
17 1980 1481 106.8 -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) +0.76
18 1974 1516 105.0 +18 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 +1.34 1981 1622 128.1 -127 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.48
19 1975 1509 103.6 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 +1.56 1982 1638 118.0 -125 -5 -130 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.77
20 1976 1634 124.5 -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91 1983 1612 104.4 -134 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.33
21 1977 1774 133.4 -215 +53 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88 1984 1585 95.2 28.6% -1.43 1–0 +0.64
22 1978 1643 119.2 -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87 1985 1531 92.9 0.0% -2.67 +0.31
23 1979 1615 118.8 -69 -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 +0.94
24 1980 1579 102.2 +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1981 1652 129.6 +130 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54
26 1982 1618 104.2 +106 50.0% +0.38 0–2 +0.59
27 1983 1625 105.5 40.0% -1.80 1–0 +0.05
Career 1800 126.9 -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59 1735 116.9 -125 -4 -78 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.