H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Florenta Mihai vs M Janssens H2H: 1-0

Florenta Mihai holds a 1–0 lead over M Janssens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1974 Nice Intl semifinal 6-2 6-2.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florenta Mihai 6-2 6-2 M Janssens Match data Apr 20, 1974* SF Nice Intl WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florenta Mihai — — — 1,800 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
M Janssens — — — 1,521 2 2 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Florenta Mihai M Janssens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1974 3–2 60.0% — 1,515 0 0 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,487 0 0
1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
1977 16–13 55.2% — 1,774 0 1 — — — — — — —
1978 7–20 25.9% — 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
1979 7–9 43.8% — 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
1980 7–9 43.8% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
1981 30–13 69.8% — 1,652 0 3 — — — — — — —
1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Florenta Mihai M Janssens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1974 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0% Career — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Florenta Mihai M Janssens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1974 1516 105.0 — — — — — +18 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 — +1.27 1974 1487 90.8 — — — — — +9 — 33.3% -2.50 — — — +0.49
1975 1509 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 1634 124.6 — — — — -65 +1 -50 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 1775 133.5 — — — — -216 +53 — 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 1643 119.3 — — — — -39 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1615 118.7 — — — — -69 — -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 — +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1578 102.2 — — — — — +170 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1652 129.6 — — — — — +131 — 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1618 104.2 — — — — — +106 — 50.0% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1625 105.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1800 127.0 — — — — -98 +67 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.24 Career 1522 94.8 — — — — — +9 — 33.3% -2.50 — — — +16.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.