H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Florenta Mihai vs Mary Carillo H2H: 0-1

Mary Carillo holds a 1–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Carillo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Carillo won the 1979 Canadian Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-4.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 69 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Carillo 3-6 6-4 6-4 Florenta Mihai Match data Aug 16, 1979* R32 Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florenta Mihai 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mary Carillo 1,774 47 45 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florenta Mihai Mary Carillo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1974 1–1 50.0% 1,503 0 0
18 1974 3–2 60.0% 1,515 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
19 1975 4–5 44.4% 1,508 0 0 1976 3–2 60.0% 1,549 0 0
20 1976 13–16 44.8% 1,634 0 0 1977 17–16 51.5% 1,687 0 1
21 1977 16–13 55.2% 1,774 0 1 1978 1–3 25.0% 1,651 0 1
22 1978 7–20 25.9% 1,642 0 1 1979 24–13 64.9% 1,773 0 3
23 1979 7–9 43.8% 1,615 0 1 1980 1–8 11.1% 1,681 0 3
24 1980 7–9 43.8% 1,578 0 1
25 1981 30–13 69.8% 1,652 0 3 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,675 0 3
26 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,618 0 3
27 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,624 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florenta Mihai Mary Carillo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1974 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1976 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
21 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1979 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1981 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 19 14 33 57.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florenta Mihai Mary Carillo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1974 1503 102.1 50.0% +0.25 +0.38
18 1974 1516 105.0 +18 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 +1.34 1975 1493 99.6 0.0% -4.00 +0.06
19 1975 1509 103.6 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 +1.56 1976 1549 111.5 +42 63.6% +0.18 0–1 2–0 -0.30
20 1976 1634 124.5 -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91 1977 1687 139.8 -75 -32 -137 55.1% +0.23 3–9 (25%) 5–2 (71%) 98.7 +0.45
21 1977 1774 133.4 -215 +53 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88 1978 1652 99.9 -50 33.3% -1.50 0–1 +0.68
22 1978 1643 119.2 -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87 1979 1774 136.1 -99 -43 -147 62.7% +0.83 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 +1.78
23 1979 1615 118.8 -69 -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 +0.94 1980 1681 104.4 -107 -107 20.0% -2.00 0–2 1–1 -1.00
24 1980 1579 102.2 +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1981 1652 129.6 +130 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54 1982 1676 108.7 0.0% -3.50 -0.51
26 1982 1618 104.2 +106 50.0% +0.38 0–2 +0.59
27 1983 1625 105.5 40.0% -1.80 1–0 +0.05
Career 1800 126.9 -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59 1774 134.3 -85 -26 -135 53.4% +0.13 8–16 (33%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.