H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Frances Candy vs Jill Cooper H2H: 0-1

Jill Cooper holds a 1–0 lead over Frances Candy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Cooper leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Cooper won the 1971 Guildford round of 32 6-0 6-0.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Cooper 6-0 6-0 Frances Candy Match data May 6, 1971* R32 Guildford WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frances Candy 1,500 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jill Cooper 1,842 106 86 55.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Frances Candy Jill Cooper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1968 8–11 42.1% 1,502 0 0
1970 0–1 0.0% 1,472 0 0 1969 15–16 48.4% 1,563 0 0
1971 1–4 20.0% 1,458 0 0 1970 18–16 52.9% 1,636 0 1
1972 2–3 40.0% 1,462 0 0 1971 36–19 65.5% 1,755 0 3
1973 3–7 30.0% 1,445 0 0 1972 21–18 53.8% 1,782 0 4
1974 0–2 0.0% 1,426 0 0 1973 8–6 57.1% 1,810 0 5

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Frances Candy Jill Cooper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1968 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 8 7 15 53.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1970 17 13 30 56.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
1972 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 27 11 38 71.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1973 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 2 3 5 40.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
Career 5 11 16 31.2% 1 7 8 12.5% Career 2 4 6 33.3% 64 45 109 58.7% 30 27 57 52.6% 10 10 20 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Frances Candy Jill Cooper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1489 96.0 33.3% -2.67 0–1 -0.12 1968 1503 104.1 +72 -22 -18 45.0% -0.23 0–2 +0.30
1970 1473 91.5 0.0% -5.50 +0.17 1969 1563 120.2 -4 +8 -38 51.6% +0.50 1–3 (25%) +0.29
1971 1459 94.9 +6 20.0% -2.60 -0.05 1970 1637 131.2 +37 -131 54.8% +0.47 3–6 (33%) +0.24
1972 1463 103.4 +31 40.0% -0.70 +0.16 1971 1755 149.8 +87 -136 69.2% +1.79 2–9 (18%) 2–0 +0.56
1973 1445 95.2 +36 +28 28.6% -2.19 1–0 0–1 +0.55 1972 1782 139.2 -234 +33 -67 56.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) -2.79
1974 1426 98.0 0.0% -4.00 +0.19 1973 1811 126.8 -140 -88 53.1% +0.34 3–1 (75%) +0.26
Career 1500 93.6 +28 +28 26.0% -2.28 1–1 0–1 +3.75 Career 1843 138.6 -106 +45 -80 57.7% +0.82 12–25 (32%) 2–0 -0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.