H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-1

Francesca Schiavone holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on carpet, while Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2009 Osaka third round 7-5 6-2.

ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 2009* Osaka WTA 250 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #26 7-5 6-2 Anne Kremer #876 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Francesca Schiavone #30 5-7 6-4 6-3 Anne Kremer #118 Match data
Feb 14, 2002* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Carpet Anne Kremer #30 6-4 6-1 Francesca Schiavone #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8