H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francesca Schiavone vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-2
Conchita Martínez holds a 2–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2005 Los Angeles quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2005* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Francesca Schiavone | 7-5 6-4 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2003* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-3 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 19, 2001* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-2 6-3 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francesca Schiavone | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |
| 34 | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |