H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-2

Conchita Martínez holds a 2–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2005 Los Angeles quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francesca Schiavone #28 7-5 6-4 Conchita Martínez #50 Match data Aug 13, 2005* QF Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #19 6-1 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #35 Match data Jun 19, 2003* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Conchita Martínez #14 6-2 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #72 Match data May 19, 2001* QF Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,965 445 370 54.6% 1 0 0 1 6 8
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,576 0 0 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,656 0 0 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2004 35–23 60.3% #19 1,839 0 0 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,957 0 0 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,800 0 0 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,836 0 1 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2008 24–22 52.2% #30 1,774 0 1 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,828 0 2 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,901 1 4 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,811 1 4 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2012 21–22 48.8% #35 1,684 1 5 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,724 1 6 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,620 1 6 — — — — — — —
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 — — — — — — —
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,595 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 — — — — — — —
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francesca Schiavone Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2000 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2003 22 14 36 61.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2004 20 15 35 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2005 27 15 42 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2010 22 15 37 59.5% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
34 2014 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 0 8 8 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 241 222 463 52.1% 147 91 238 61.8% 39 42 81 48.1% 18 15 33 54.5% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 516/714 of Francesca Schiavone's and 18/135 of Conchita Martínez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francesca Schiavone Conchita Martínez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 10/55 2.4 3.0 50.8% 65.9% 49.0% 54.3% 53.1% 57.1% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 8/58 3.3 2.4 48.7% 69.7% 46.9% 67.2% 65.9% 58.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 13/60 3.8 3.3 54.1% 67.9% 48.8% 53.2% 47.0% 58.5% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 42/58 2.9 4.0 53.0% 70.3% 49.7% 55.6% 46.2% 60.4% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 45/49 2.5 5.0 52.4% 67.8% 45.9% 57.6% 45.9% 57.3% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 38/46 2.2 3.9 52.0% 66.6% 46.0% 50.7% 47.9% 56.5% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 55/60 2.5 3.9 54.7% 67.4% 47.5% 51.6% 50.5% 58.4% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 54/59 1.9 3.5 57.5% 65.7% 49.4% 57.4% 50.9% 58.8% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 51/55 2.8 4.8 54.2% 68.4% 46.3% 48.7% 44.7% 58.2% 43.8% 2003 10/50 1.5 3.6 58.2% 62.7% 46.9% 50.8% 52.5% 55.9% 49.1%
32 2012 39/43 2.4 5.5 51.1% 65.0% 47.0% 51.3% 42.6% 56.0% 41.6% 2004 4/37 3.0 3.8 57.1% 64.2% 49.7% 52.7% 37.0% 58.0% 42.7%
33 2013 47/49 2.4 5.9 53.6% 63.5% 44.8% 52.1% 51.5% 54.7% 43.0% 2005 4/48 2.3 3.3 60.9% 58.0% 45.4% 59.9% 60.8% 52.9% 44.2%
34 2014 36/39 3.1 3.6 55.5% 65.1% 47.8% 53.8% 48.8% 57.3% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 22/26 2.1 4.2 55.3% 61.7% 49.2% 48.0% 45.8% 56.1% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 26/27 1.8 5.2 52.7% 64.1% 42.5% 39.1% 50.0% 53.8% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 25/25 2.0 4.3 56.5% 64.3% 46.8% 53.8% 46.2% 57.0% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 5/5 2.2 7.0 53.1% 61.4% 44.1% 55.5% 29.7% 53.1% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 516/816 2.5 4.4 53.9% 66.2% 47.0% 52.6% 48.0% 57.3% 43.9% — 18/955 2.0 3.6 58.6% 62.0% 47.2% 53.2% 50.9% 55.7% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francesca Schiavone Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.57
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.51
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.28
19 1999 1495 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) — -3.74
20 2000 1577 111.6 — — — — +27 -58 — 61.5% +0.77 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.07 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) — -3.06
21 2001 1656 124.9 — — — — -51 +25 -48 52.3% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.44 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.51
22 2002 1692 130.7 — — — — -56 -1 -76 45.5% -0.20 10–5 (67%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.48 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.84
23 2003 1804 145.2 +1.14 +1.01 1.051 51.1% +5 -111 -146 54.6% +0.26 10–3 (77%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.09 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) — -1.30
24 2004 1840 144.5 +1.62 -0.20 1.017 50.9% -13 -40 -204 56.1% +0.32 12–4 (75%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.09 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.86
25 2005 1958 157.0 +1.87 +0.33 1.031 50.8% +6 -125 — 61.4% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 9–5 (64%) — -2.53 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.78
26 2006 1800 149.9 +4.22 +2.51 1.172 53.2% -2 +102 -135 59.0% +1.00 8–6 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.44 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.15
27 2007 1836 133.7 +1.60 -0.02 1.013 50.4% -7 +41 -168 50.5% -0.15 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.91 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.25
28 2008 1774 149.6 +1.76 +0.31 0.997 50.0% +15 +71 -153 53.4% +0.36 4–9 (31%) 6–4 (60%) — -2.68 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) — +0.60
29 2009 1829 141.0 +2.94 +1.36 1.088 51.6% -32 -4 -42 55.6% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.75 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) — +2.93
30 2010 1901 156.3 +3.15 +2.63 1.128 52.6% -46 +83 — 62.5% +0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.28 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.17
31 2011 1811 143.2 +2.98 +0.45 1.049 51.1% -43 +181 -71 58.3% +0.59 11–10 (52%) 6–8 (43%) — +2.37 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.01
32 2012 1685 125.9 +0.25 -1.18 0.947 49.0% -45 +232 +102 48.9% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.43 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.78
33 2013 1724 139.3 0.00 -0.13 0.949 48.7% -23 +111 +43 49.1% -0.12 11–9 (55%) 11–9 (55%) — -3.10 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.48
34 2014 1621 131.4 +0.79 -0.71 0.996 50.0% -4 +144 +100 38.9% -0.30 5–9 (36%) 2–5 (29%) — -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1562 117.6 -1.24 -0.38 0.957 48.9% +24 +121 — 37.3% -0.73 3–4 (43%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1596 117.3 -1.53 +0.62 0.987 49.7% -20 +130 +36 53.6% +0.07 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1619 116.3 +0.09 -0.88 0.980 49.6% -110 +194 -13 45.5% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1502 100.1 -2.95 -1.92 0.801 45.1% — +232 — 16.7% -2.58 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1966 145.3 +1.56 +0.52 1.028 50.6% -17 +67 -42 52.9% +0.26 130–106 (55%) 88–91 (49%) 101.3 -0.80 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.