H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 4-2

Francesca Schiavone holds a 4–2 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Francesca Schiavone leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2006 New Haven third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 2006* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #15 6-3 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #33 Match data
May 5, 2006* Warsaw WTA 500 R16 Clay Francesca Schiavone #11 6-4 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #17 Match data
Aug 6, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #39 6-2 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #17 Match data
May 14, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Francesca Schiavone #19 6-1 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #48 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #38 6-2 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #18 Match data
Feb 28, 2002* Scottsdale WTA 500 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #24 6-4 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Elena Likhovtseva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 — — — — — — —
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6 — — — — — — —
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 — — — — — — —
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 — — — — — — —
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 — — — — — — —