H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francesca Schiavone vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-1
Francesca Schiavone and Irina Falconi Hartman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on clay, while Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2016 Miami first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Irina Falconi Hartman | 7-5 6-1 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 20, 2011* | Brussels | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 6-4 6-4 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Francesca Schiavone | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |