H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 1-3

Jelena Dokic holds a 3–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2011 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francesca Schiavone #7 6-4 1-6 6-3 Jelena Dokic #45 Match data Jun 22, 2011* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jelena Dokic #91 2-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #5 Match data Mar 3, 2011* R32 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jelena Dokic #11 6-2 6-0 Francesca Schiavone #40 Match data Oct 6, 2001* QF Moscow Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Jelena Dokic #43 7-6 7-5 Francesca Schiavone #112 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,965 445 370 54.6% 1 0 0 1 6 8
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,033 212 177 54.5% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,611 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 32–21 60.4% #24 1,784 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 2,002 0 3
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,899 0 5
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,576 0 0 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,656 0 0 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,572 0 5
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,517 0 5
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,491 0 5
24 2004 35–23 60.3% #19 1,839 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,957 0 0 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,473 0 5
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,800 0 0 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,523 0 5
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,836 0 1 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,510 0 5
28 2008 24–22 52.2% #30 1,774 0 1 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,828 0 2 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,901 1 4 — — — — — — —
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,811 1 4 — — — — — — —
32 2012 21–22 48.8% #35 1,684 1 5 — — — — — — —
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,724 1 6 — — — — — — —
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,620 1 6 — — — — — — —
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 — — — — — — —
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,595 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 — — — — — — —
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francesca Schiavone Jelena Dokic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 26 11 37 70.3% 16 8 24 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3%
19 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
20 2000 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 22 14 36 61.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 20 15 35 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 27 15 42 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 22 15 37 59.5% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 0 8 8 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 241 222 463 52.1% 147 91 238 61.8% 39 42 81 48.1% 18 15 33 54.5% — 103 94 197 52.3% 61 49 110 55.5% 30 17 47 63.8% 18 17 35 51.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 516/714 of Francesca Schiavone's and 76/151 of Jelena Dokic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francesca Schiavone Jelena Dokic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/58 4.1 8.0 59.4% 70.1% 43.9% 62.0% 39.0% 60.0% 43.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/23 2.3 10.3 53.0% 68.8% 31.9% 50.9% 55.0% 51.3% 32.5%
23 2003 10/55 2.4 3.0 50.8% 65.9% 49.0% 54.3% 53.1% 57.1% 45.1% 2006 1/2 1.0 11.0 59.2% 67.2% 42.5% 63.6% 40.0% 57.1% 41.1%
24 2004 8/58 3.3 2.4 48.7% 69.7% 46.9% 67.2% 65.9% 58.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 13/60 3.8 3.3 54.1% 67.9% 48.8% 53.2% 47.0% 58.5% 42.8% 2008 4/4 1.8 7.0 55.1% 56.4% 27.9% 29.6% 33.0% 43.8% 32.7%
26 2006 42/58 2.9 4.0 53.0% 70.3% 49.7% 55.6% 46.2% 60.4% 46.4% 2009 14/15 3.4 7.6 60.2% 66.2% 44.7% 51.6% 53.6% 57.6% 40.1%
27 2007 45/49 2.5 5.0 52.4% 67.8% 45.9% 57.6% 45.9% 57.3% 43.2% 2010 6/6 4.0 8.0 48.3% 59.0% 42.7% 56.3% 41.5% 50.6% 36.6%
28 2008 38/46 2.2 3.9 52.0% 66.6% 46.0% 50.7% 47.9% 56.5% 43.4% 2011 30/31 4.0 7.6 56.5% 65.5% 41.2% 55.8% 48.2% 55.0% 42.4%
29 2009 55/60 2.5 3.9 54.7% 67.4% 47.5% 51.6% 50.5% 58.4% 45.2% 2012 11/12 2.8 8.5 52.4% 68.4% 48.0% 49.7% 48.6% 58.5% 41.0%
30 2010 54/59 1.9 3.5 57.5% 65.7% 49.4% 57.4% 50.9% 58.8% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 51/55 2.8 4.8 54.2% 68.4% 46.3% 48.7% 44.7% 58.2% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 39/43 2.4 5.5 51.1% 65.0% 47.0% 51.3% 42.6% 56.0% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 47/49 2.4 5.9 53.6% 63.5% 44.8% 52.1% 51.5% 54.7% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 36/39 3.1 3.6 55.5% 65.1% 47.8% 53.8% 48.8% 57.3% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 22/26 2.1 4.2 55.3% 61.7% 49.2% 48.0% 45.8% 56.1% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 26/27 1.8 5.2 52.7% 64.1% 42.5% 39.1% 50.0% 53.8% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 25/25 2.0 4.3 56.5% 64.3% 46.8% 53.8% 46.2% 57.0% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 5/5 2.2 7.0 53.1% 61.4% 44.1% 55.5% 29.7% 53.1% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 516/816 2.5 4.4 53.9% 66.2% 47.0% 52.6% 48.0% 57.3% 43.9% — 76/389 3.5 7.9 56.0% 65.6% 42.2% 53.3% 47.2% 55.4% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francesca Schiavone Jelena Dokic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1612 133.7 — — — — -50 -32 +56 50.0% +0.10 5–5 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1784 148.2 — — — — -86 -71 +45 59.7% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 106.9 -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2003 163.4 — — — — -34 -133 -99 66.9% +1.26 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 101.9 -0.37
19 1999 1495 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 2002 1899 156.5 — — — — -16 +81 +103 64.7% +0.94 17–8 (68%) 10–4 (71%) 108.9 +0.53
20 2000 1577 111.6 — — — — +27 -58 — 61.5% +0.77 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.07 2003 1779 142.2 +2.27 +0.61 1.076 51.3% +34 +61 +149 48.5% -0.25 9–11 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 99.5 +1.66
21 2001 1656 124.9 — — — — -51 +25 -48 52.3% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 +0.44 2004 1573 109.3 -1.18 -3.35 0.666 42.8% +137 +131 +216 32.1% -1.30 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 95.1 +1.39
22 2002 1692 130.7 — — — — -56 -1 -76 45.5% -0.20 10–5 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 104.9 +0.48 2005 1517 98.3 — — — — +150 +121 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 1–1 — +0.38
23 2003 1804 145.2 +1.14 +1.01 1.051 51.1% +5 -111 -146 54.6% +0.26 10–3 (77%) 4–4 (50%) 107.0 -0.09 2006 1491 99.0 -1.59 -1.92 0.960 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–2 — +0.08
24 2004 1840 144.5 +1.62 -0.20 1.017 50.9% -13 -40 -204 56.1% +0.32 12–4 (75%) 11–7 (61%) 107.4 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 1958 157.0 +1.87 +0.33 1.031 50.8% +6 -125 — 61.4% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 -2.53 2008 1474 92.2 -2.56 -3.96 0.581 38.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — +0.02
26 2006 1800 149.9 +4.22 +2.51 1.172 53.2% -2 +102 -135 59.0% +1.00 8–6 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.44 2009 1523 124.6 +1.93 -1.71 0.946 48.8% +118 +63 — 41.7% -0.33 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 -0.16
27 2007 1836 133.7 +1.60 -0.02 1.013 50.4% -7 +41 -168 50.5% -0.15 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -0.91 2010 1510 111.3 -2.42 -1.14 0.741 43.8% +104 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.69
28 2008 1774 149.6 +1.76 +0.31 0.997 50.0% +15 +71 -153 53.4% +0.36 4–9 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 -2.68 2011 1592 124.8 -0.96 -1.42 0.942 48.7% +38 -55 +172 49.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 104.3 -0.32
29 2009 1829 141.0 +2.94 +1.36 1.088 51.6% -32 -4 -42 55.6% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 5–9 (36%) 99.4 -0.75 2012 1517 117.2 +0.82 -2.07 0.988 50.0% +50 — — 39.1% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.34
30 2010 1901 156.3 +3.15 +2.63 1.128 52.6% -46 +83 — 62.5% +0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 1811 143.2 +2.98 +0.45 1.049 51.1% -43 +181 -71 58.3% +0.59 11–10 (52%) 6–8 (43%) 98.0 +2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1685 125.9 +0.25 -1.18 0.947 49.0% -45 +232 +102 48.9% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 101.5 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1724 139.3 0.00 -0.13 0.949 48.7% -23 +111 +43 49.1% -0.12 11–9 (55%) 11–9 (55%) 103.8 -3.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1621 131.4 +0.79 -0.71 0.996 50.0% -4 +144 +100 38.9% -0.30 5–9 (36%) 2–5 (29%) 93.1 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1562 117.6 -1.24 -0.38 0.957 48.9% +24 +121 — 37.3% -0.73 3–4 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.9 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1596 117.3 -1.53 +0.62 0.987 49.7% -20 +130 +36 53.6% +0.07 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 101.4 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1619 116.3 +0.12 -0.86 0.980 49.6% -110 +194 -13 45.5% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1502 100.1 -2.95 -1.92 0.801 45.1% — +232 — 16.7% -2.58 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1966 145.3 +1.57 +0.52 1.028 50.6% -17 +67 -42 52.9% +0.26 130–106 (55%) 88–91 (49%) 101.3 -0.80 — 2033 149.9 -0.09 -1.57 0.907 48.0% +6 +1 +68 54.7% +0.30 62–62 (50%) 45–34 (57%) 104.1 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.