H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Jill Craybas H2H: 4-1

Francesca Schiavone holds a 4–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2009 Los Angeles second round 7-6(7) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Jill Craybas #81 7-6(7) 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #25 Match data
May 27, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Francesca Schiavone #19 6-3 6-2 Jill Craybas #62 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #25 6-4 6-4 Jill Craybas #100 Match data
Jul 24, 2003* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #32 6-3 6-1 Jill Craybas #74 Match data
Jan 4, 2001* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Francesca Schiavone #80 7-5 6-3 Jill Craybas #145 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1