H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 5-0

Francesca Schiavone holds a 5–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2014 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 4-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 12, 2014* Hong Kong WTA 250 R16 Hard Francesca Schiavone #74 6-3 4-0 (ret.) Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Sep 21, 2013* Seoul WTA 250 QF Hard Francesca Schiavone #56 4-6 6-4 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
May 29, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Francesca Schiavone #12 6-3 6-1 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Oct 1, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Francesca Schiavone #8 6-3 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Francesca Schiavone #18 6-3 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 — — — — — — —
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 — — — — — — —
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 — — — — — — —
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 — — — — — — —
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6 — — — — — — —
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 — — — — — — —
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8