H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-5

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2006 New Haven fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2006* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #11 6-4 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #15 Match data
Oct 22, 2005* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-4 4-6 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #18 Match data
Oct 7, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #22 Match data
Sep 18, 2005* Bali WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #28 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-1 Francesca Schiavone #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 — — — — — — —
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6 — — — — — — —
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 — — — — — — —
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 — — — — — — —
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 — — — — — — —