H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 4-1

Francesca Schiavone holds a 4–1 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2014 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2014* Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 R32 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #70 6-4 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #43 Match data
May 2, 2013* Oeiras WTA 250 R32 Clay Francesca Schiavone #37 6-2 4-6 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #47 Match data
Apr 28, 2013* Marrakech WTA 250 F Clay Francesca Schiavone #48 6-1 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #59 Match data
Mar 24, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #4 6-4 7-6(2) Lourdes Domínguez Lino #49 Match data
Apr 16, 2009* Barcelona WTA 250 R32 Clay Francesca Schiavone #44 7-6(4) 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 — — — — — — —
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 — — — — — — —