H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francesca Schiavone vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 1-1
Francesca Schiavone and Magdalena Maleeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2001 Rome third round 6-3 4-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2001* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2001* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-2 7-5 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francesca Schiavone | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |