H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 1-2

Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 2–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on clay, while Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2006 Birmingham third round 6-0 4-6 6-1.

ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2006* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Francesca Schiavone #14 6-0 4-6 6-1 Maria Vento-Kabchi #120 Match data
Apr 28, 2005* Warsaw WTA 500 R32 Clay Maria Vento-Kabchi #58 5-1 (ret.) Francesca Schiavone #20 Match data
Jul 17, 2004* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Maria Vento-Kabchi #32 6-4 6-1 Francesca Schiavone #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,716 95 156 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Maria Vento-Kabchi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,629 0 0
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,653 0 0
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,535 0 0
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,537 0 0
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,534 0 0
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,512 0 0
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,714 0 0
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2004 18–26 40.9% #48 1,628 0 0
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,573 0 0
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,461 0 0
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8