H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-2

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2003 Dubai fourth round 6-3 6-2.

ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 2003* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #11 6-3 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #40 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Monica Seles #10 6-4 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8