H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Francoise Durr vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 3-0

Francoise Durr holds a 3–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francoise Durr leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1978 San Antonio round of 32 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francoise Durr
FRA Age 83 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francoise Durr 6-4 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Sep 14, 1978* R32 San Antonio WTA 250 Hard
Francoise Durr 6-4 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Oct 10, 1975* R16 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Francoise Durr 6-1 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jan 27, 1975 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francoise Durr — #9 — 2,152 373 232 61.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francoise Durr Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 — — — — — — — 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5
24 — — — — — — — 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6
25 1968 20–10 66.7% — 1,670 0 0 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6
26 1969 37–18 67.3% — 1,811 0 1 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1970 47–26 64.4% — 1,967 0 2 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1971 86–33 72.3% — 2,119 0 7 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6
29 1972 50–25 66.7% — 2,030 0 8 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1973 32–21 60.4% — 2,069 0 9 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 1974 27–17 61.4% — 2,026 0 9 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6
32 1975 28–18 60.9% #9 1,998 0 9 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 1976 18–20 47.4% — 1,926 0 9 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6
34 1977 13–20 39.4% — 1,827 0 9 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6
35 1978 12–11 52.2% — 1,822 0 9 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 1979 3–12 20.0% — 1,701 0 9 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6
38 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francoise Durr Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1969 4 3 7 57.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1970 6 3 9 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 16 7 23 69.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 31 6 37 83.8% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 18 47 61.7% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1972 8 5 13 61.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1973 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 1974 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1975 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 13 21 38.1% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 1978 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 45 109 58.7% 111 49 160 69.4% 92 43 135 68.1% 106 95 201 52.7% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francoise Durr Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53
25 1968 1671 125.2 — — — — -130 -81 +37 65.6% +1.29 1–2 (33%) — — -0.23 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40
26 1969 1812 140.2 — — — — -212 +25 -17 65.3% +1.20 5–5 (50%) — — -3.97 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98
27 1970 1968 159.5 — — — — -29 -103 -11 67.8% +1.40 2–9 (18%) 2–0 — -10.72 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69
28 1971 2120 163.4 — — — — -83 +32 -44 69.0% +1.54 16–14 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -10.25 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17
29 1972 2031 161.2 — — — — -12 +120 +35 64.8% +1.36 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 100.4 -8.83 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66
30 1973 2069 162.2 — — — — +57 +52 -58 59.8% +0.59 7–6 (54%) 8–1 (89%) 106.2 -10.56 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69
31 1974 2026 155.3 — — — — +75 +39 -41 61.1% +0.81 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -7.90 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55
32 1975 1999 154.9 — — — — +21 +80 — 61.8% +0.83 7–7 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 -2.14 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48
33 1976 1926 142.9 — — — — -3 +134 +25 50.6% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 6–2 (75%) 98.6 -2.32 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 1977 1827 134.7 — — — — +2 +160 +99 38.2% -1.13 4–2 (67%) 0–4 (0%) 97.6 -5.07 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 1978 1822 132.4 — — — — -38 +113 +139 55.1% +0.29 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.0 -0.56 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 1979 1701 114.1 — — — — -24 — +245 25.8% -2.00 1–2 (33%) — — -0.68 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
38 1981 1698 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2153 158.7 — — — — -17 +26 +8 61.4% +0.88 63–69 (48%) 43–27 (61%) 101.8 -10.72 — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.