H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Esme Emmanuel H2H: 4-0
Francoise Durr holds a 4–0 lead over Esme Emmanuel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francoise Durr leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1972 Denver third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 83
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Age 79
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1972* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Francoise Durr | 6-1 6-0 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Francoise Durr | 6-1 6-1 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1971* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Francoise Durr | 6-1 7-5 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1968* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Francoise Durr | 6-3 6-3 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Esme Emmanuel | — | — | — | 1,766 | 77 | 85 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Esme Emmanuel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–17 | 19.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |