H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 1-0
Francoise Durr holds a 1–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francoise Durr leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1976 Chicago third round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1976* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 6-3 7-6(2) | Florenta Mihai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,803 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |