H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 2-2
Francoise Durr and Ingrid Bentzer are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ingrid Bentzer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1973 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 83
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Francoise Durr | 6-2 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1972* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Francoise Durr | 6-3 6-4 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1970* | Bastad | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 1-3 (ret.) | Francoise Durr | Match data |
| Nov 30, 1969* | Stockholm 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ingrid Bentzer | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | Francoise Durr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |