H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Francoise Durr vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Francoise Durr holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francoise Durr leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1974 Phoenix round of 32 2-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francoise Durr
FRA Age 83 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francoise Durr 2-6 6-2 7-5 Kate Latham Match data Oct 10, 1974* R32 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francoise Durr — #9 — 2,152 373 232 61.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francoise Durr Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1968 20–10 66.7% — 1,670 0 0 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1969 37–18 67.3% — 1,811 0 1 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1970 47–26 64.4% — 1,967 0 2 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1971 86–33 72.3% — 2,119 0 7 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1972 50–25 66.7% — 2,030 0 8 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1973 32–21 60.4% — 2,069 0 9 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1974 27–17 61.4% — 2,026 0 9 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 1975 28–18 60.9% #9 1,998 0 9 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6
33 1976 18–20 47.4% — 1,926 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1977 13–20 39.4% — 1,827 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 1978 12–11 52.2% — 1,822 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 1979 3–12 20.0% — 1,701 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francoise Durr Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1969 4 3 7 57.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1970 6 3 9 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 16 7 23 69.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 31 6 37 83.8% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 18 47 61.7% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1972 8 5 13 61.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1973 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1974 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1975 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1978 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 45 109 58.7% 111 49 160 69.4% 92 43 135 68.1% 106 95 201 52.7% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francoise Durr Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1968 1671 125.2 — — — — -130 -81 +37 65.6% +1.29 1–2 (33%) — — -0.23 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1969 1812 140.2 — — — — -212 +25 -17 65.3% +1.20 5–5 (50%) — — -3.97 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1970 1968 159.5 — — — — -29 -103 -11 67.8% +1.40 2–9 (18%) 2–0 — -10.72 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1971 2120 163.4 — — — — -83 +32 -44 69.0% +1.54 16–14 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -10.25 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1972 2031 161.2 — — — — -12 +120 +35 64.8% +1.36 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 100.4 -8.83 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1973 2069 162.2 — — — — +57 +52 -58 59.8% +0.59 7–6 (54%) 8–1 (89%) 106.2 -10.56 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 1974 2026 155.3 — — — — +75 +39 -41 61.1% +0.81 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -7.90 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 1975 1999 154.9 — — — — +21 +80 — 61.8% +0.83 7–7 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 -2.14 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
33 1976 1926 142.9 — — — — -3 +134 +25 50.6% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 6–2 (75%) 98.6 -2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1977 1827 134.7 — — — — +2 +160 +99 38.2% -1.13 4–2 (67%) 0–4 (0%) 97.6 -5.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1978 1822 132.4 — — — — -38 +113 +139 55.1% +0.29 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.0 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1979 1701 114.1 — — — — -24 — +245 25.8% -2.00 1–2 (33%) — — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1981 1698 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2153 158.7 — — — — -17 +26 +8 61.4% +0.88 63–69 (48%) 43–27 (61%) 101.8 -10.72 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.