H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Marcie Louie H2H: 3-0
Francoise Durr holds a 3–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francoise Durr leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1976 Boston third round 7-6(1) 4-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 83
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 72
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1976* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 7-6(1) 4-6 7-6(4) | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1974 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 6-4 7-6 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1972* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 6-3 6-2 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |