H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Mona Guerrant H2H: 3-1
Francoise Durr holds a 3–1 lead over Mona Guerrant in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Francoise Durr leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mona Guerrant won the 1978 Detroit third round 0-6 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 83
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1978* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mona Guerrant | 0-6 6-0 6-1 | Francoise Durr | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1975* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1972* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Francoise Durr | 6-2 6-4 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1972* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Francoise Durr | 6-3 6-0 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Mona Guerrant | — | — | — | 1,939 | 123 | 117 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Mona Guerrant | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,886 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |