H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Francoise Durr vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 7-0

Francoise Durr holds a 7–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Francoise Durr leads 4–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1977 Atlanta round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francoise Durr
FRA Age 83 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francoise Durr 6-4 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 6, 1977* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Francoise Durr 6-2 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Feb 25, 1977* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Francoise Durr 3-6 6-3 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Apr 23, 1975* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Francoise Durr 6-0 4-6 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jan 25, 1974* R16 Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard
Francoise Durr 2-6 6-3 7-6(2) Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 18, 1972* R16 Denver WTA 250 Hard
Francoise Durr 6-3 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 7, 1972* R16 Indianapolis Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Francoise Durr 3-6 6-2 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Nov 12, 1971* R16 Torquay WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francoise Durr — #9 — 2,152 373 233 61.6% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francoise Durr Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1968 20–10 66.7% — 1,670 0 0 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1969 37–18 67.3% — 1,811 0 1 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,763 0 3
27 1970 47–26 64.4% — 1,967 0 2 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,724 0 3
28 1971 86–33 72.3% — 2,119 0 7 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,747 0 3
29 1972 50–25 66.7% — 2,030 0 8 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3
30 1973 32–21 60.4% — 2,069 0 9 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,790 0 4
31 1974 27–17 61.4% — 2,026 0 9 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4
32 1975 28–19 59.6% #9 1,997 0 9 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,652 0 4
33 1976 18–20 47.4% — 1,927 0 9 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 1977 13–20 39.4% — 1,828 0 9 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4
35 1978 12–11 52.2% — 1,823 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 1979 3–12 20.0% — 1,702 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francoise Durr Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1969 4 3 7 57.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1970 6 3 9 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 16 7 23 69.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 31 6 37 83.8% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 18 47 61.7% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1972 8 5 13 61.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 1973 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1974 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 1975 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 13 21 38.1% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1978 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 45 109 58.7% 111 49 160 69.4% 92 43 135 68.1% 106 95 201 52.7% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francoise Durr Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.14
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.15
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.82
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +95 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.09
25 1968 1671 125.2 — — — — -130 -81 +37 65.6% +1.29 1–2 (33%) — — -0.23 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.00
26 1969 1812 140.2 — — — — -212 +25 -17 65.3% +1.20 5–5 (50%) — — -3.97 1977 1764 141.6 — — — — -106 -1 +156 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.70
27 1970 1968 159.5 — — — — -29 -103 -11 67.8% +1.40 2–9 (18%) 2–0 — -10.72 1978 1724 122.8 — — — — -146 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.04
28 1971 2120 163.4 — — — — -83 +32 -44 69.0% +1.54 16–14 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -10.25 1979 1748 144.5 — — — — -120 -20 +182 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.5 -1.66
29 1972 2031 161.2 — — — — -12 +120 +35 64.8% +1.36 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 100.4 -8.85 1980 1803 134.7 — — — — -94 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.52
30 1973 2069 162.2 — — — — +57 +52 -58 59.8% +0.59 7–6 (54%) 8–1 (89%) 106.2 -10.27 1981 1790 134.8 — — — — -127 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.18
31 1974 2026 155.3 — — — — +75 +39 -41 61.1% +0.81 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -7.71 1982 1684 118.6 — — — — -147 — +189 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.24
32 1975 1998 155.0 — — — — +22 +82 — 61.8% +0.83 7–7 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 -2.85 1983 1653 106.0 — — — — -84 +78 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.79
33 1976 1927 143.1 — — — — -2 +134 +24 50.6% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 6–2 (75%) 98.6 -2.17 1984 1616 107.2 — — — — -38 +69 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.24
34 1977 1829 134.9 — — — — +3 +159 +96 38.2% -1.13 4–2 (67%) 0–4 (0%) 97.6 -5.12 1985 1589 113.4 — — — — -41 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.54
35 1978 1823 132.6 — — — — -39 +112 +137 55.1% +0.29 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.0 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1979 1703 114.4 — — — — -24 — +242 25.8% -2.00 1–2 (33%) — — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1981 1699 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2153 158.8 — — — — -17 +26 +8 61.4% +0.88 63–69 (48%) 43–27 (61%) 101.8 -10.77 — 1923 143.1 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.