H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Winnie Shaw H2H: 1-1
Francoise Durr and Winnie Shaw are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1971 Edinburgh quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1971* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 6-1 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1970* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 6-1 | Francoise Durr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Winnie Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |