H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Gabriela Sabatini vs Ann Grossman H2H: 3-1
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 3–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Gabriela Sabatini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1996 US Open second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| May 13, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-3 6-4 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data |
| May 10, 1990* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Gabriela Sabatini | 7-6(3) 6-0 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-4 7-6 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gabriela Sabatini | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |