H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Gabriela Sabatini vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 4-3

Gabriela Sabatini holds a 4–3 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Gabriela Sabatini leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 San Diego quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gabriela Sabatini
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 1996* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-1 Gabriela Sabatini #15 Match data
Mar 22, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 1-6 7-6 7-6 Gabriela Sabatini #7 Match data
Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals SF Carpet Gabriela Sabatini #9 4-6 6-0 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 14, 1993* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Gabriela Sabatini #3 7-5 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Sep 27, 1992* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 QF Hard Gabriela Sabatini #3 6-4 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Feb 2, 1992* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 SF Carpet Gabriela Sabatini #3 6-3 6-0 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Aug 17, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 3-6 6-1 6-4 Gabriela Sabatini #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gabriela Sabatini #56 #3 228 2,398 607 182 76.9% 1 8 2 2 14 27
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gabriela Sabatini Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1984 7–5 58.3% #74 1,585 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1985 48–18 72.7% #12 1,947 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1986 49–21 70.0% #9 2,023 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1987 62–16 79.5% #6 2,264 0 5 — — — — — — —
18 1988 61–13 82.4% #4 2,276 0 9 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1989 58–12 82.9% #3 2,257 0 13 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1990 49–14 77.8% #5 2,231 1 15 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1991 62–11 84.9% #3 2,269 1 20 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1992 65–12 84.4% #3 2,291 1 25 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1993 51–18 73.9% #5 2,108 1 25 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1994 42–17 71.2% #7 2,055 1 26 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1995 41–16 71.9% #7 2,062 1 27 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1996 12–9 57.1% #56 1,947 1 27 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8