H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gabriela Sabatini vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-1
Gabriela Sabatini and Mareen Louie Harper are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1991 Tokyo Pan Pacific fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1991* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-4 6-1 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1985* | Denver | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Mareen Louie Harper | 6-7 6-3 6-1 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gabriela Sabatini | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |