H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0

Gail Sherriff holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1981 Nice final 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 6-2 6-1 Andrea Temesvari Match data Apr 12, 1981* F Nice WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 — — — — — — — 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5
21 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 — — — — — — —
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 — — — — — — —
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.