H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-1

Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1979 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-2 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data Aug 30, 1979* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 — — — — — — —
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 — — — — — — —
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Anne Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Anne Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.