H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 1-1

Gail Sherriff and Betsy Nagelsen are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on clay, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1976 Gstaad semifinal 4-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 4-6 6-2 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jul 10, 1976* SF Gstaad WTA 250 Clay
Betsy Nagelsen 7-5 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data Jun 28, 1974* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 — — — — — — — 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.