H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Catherine Suire H2H: 1-0

Gail Sherriff holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1981 Nice semifinal 6-1 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Catherine Suire
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 6-1 4-6 6-4 Catherine Suire Match data Apr 11, 1981* SF Nice WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Catherine Suire #513 #52 13 1,672 79 129 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Catherine Suire
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1981 5–6 45.5% — 1,519 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1983 11–12 47.8% — 1,627 0 0
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1984 7–14 33.3% #115 1,605 0 0
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1985 6–11 35.3% #104 1,604 0 0
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1986 11–16 40.7% #84 1,581 0 0
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1987 8–11 42.1% #135 1,584 0 0
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1988 10–16 38.5% #124 1,588 0 0
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1989 6–11 35.3% #139 1,577 0 0
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1990 3–7 30.0% #189 1,546 0 0
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1991 8–10 44.4% #115 1,592 0 0
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 1992 3–10 23.1% #213 1,533 0 0
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 1993 0–2 0.0% #244 1,516 0 0
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Catherine Suire
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 31 45 76 40.8% 18 35 53 34.0% 20 29 49 40.8% 7 14 21 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Catherine Suire
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.31
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1519 113.9 — — — — — +61 — 48.0% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.38
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1501 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.21
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1983 1628 116.8 — — — — -25 -84 +53 44.4% -0.13 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 104.7 +0.90
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1984 1605 119.5 — — — — -55 -6 +55 35.4% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -0.68
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1985 1604 117.1 — — — — -49 -21 +14 34.2% -1.29 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 -0.66
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1986 1581 108.8 — — — — -11 -33 +17 39.1% -0.69 7–5 (58%) 2–6 (25%) 98.7 +1.07
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1987 1584 113.3 — — — — -31 -2 — 43.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.58
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1988 1588 119.2 — — — — +7 -54 -33 38.1% -0.76 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 103.7 -0.32
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1989 1577 115.4 — — — — +58 -84 -19 39.0% -1.41 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.19
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1990 1547 110.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.65
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1991 1592 120.8 — — — — -27 — +66 46.3% -0.32 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.09
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 1992 1534 103.0 — — — — -3 — +72 25.8% -1.68 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 100.9 -0.01
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 1993 1516 103.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 1672 120.0 — — — — -6 -24 +32 38.5% -0.86 39–32 (55%) 20–30 (40%) 101.6 +0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.