H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-5

Chris Evert holds a 5–0 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1975 Westchester third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 1975* Westchester WTA 250 R32 Clay Chris Evert 6-2 6-1 Gail Sherriff Match data
Aug 31, 1974* US Open Grand Slam R64 Grass Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Gail Sherriff Match data
Aug 12, 1974 Toronto WTA 250 R16 Clay Chris Evert 6-0 6-2 Gail Sherriff Match data
Aug 11, 1974* Indianapolis WTA 250 F Clay Chris Evert 6-0 6-0 Gail Sherriff Match data
Apr 10, 1973* Sarasota WTA 250 QF Clay Chris Evert 6-3 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,978 342 145 70.2% 0 0 0 0 41 41
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11
17 — — — — — — — 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15
18 — — — — — — — 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27
19 — — — — — — — 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39
20 — — — — — — — 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51
21 — — — — — — — 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60
22 — — — — — — — 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71
23 1968 65–14 82.3% — 1,847 0 13 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,800 0 17 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,933 0 21 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,921 0 23 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,860 0 28 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,758 0 28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,877 0 34 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,833 0 38 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,793 0 38 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,755 0 38 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,772 0 39 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,721 0 39 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,704 0 40 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,711 0 41 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,701 0 41 — — — — — — —