H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 2-1

Gail Sherriff holds a 2–1 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 2–0 on clay, while Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1978 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 7-6 6-2 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Apr 10, 1978* QF Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay
Heidi Eisterlehner 6-2 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data Nov 9, 1975* R16 Paris WTA 500 Carpet
Gail Sherriff 6-2 6-2 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Jun 8, 1972* R32 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,773 114 128 47.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Heidi Eisterlehner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,652 0 2
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,611 0 2
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1978 14–15 48.3% — 1,608 0 2
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,596 0 2
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1980 27–17 61.4% — 1,709 0 3
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,638 0 3
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,553 0 3
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Heidi Eisterlehner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — —
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 8 9 17 47.1% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 18 41 56.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Heidi Eisterlehner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.90
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.42
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.69
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.92
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -102 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.96
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1977 1612 114.0 — — — — — +52 -149 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.42
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1978 1608 119.9 — — — — +85 +48 -126 50.8% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +3.14
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1979 1596 107.1 — — — — +100 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +1.61
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1980 1709 134.1 — — — — +20 +64 — 63.5% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 99.8 +1.96
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1981 1638 110.6 — — — — +76 +55 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.57
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 1982 1548 102.3 — — — — +106 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.50
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 1983 1553 102.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.32
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 1984 1536 106.8 — — — — +87 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.39
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 1773 121.0 — — — — +58 +42 -116 48.2% -0.26 38–41 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.9 +7.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.