H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-1

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1978 Roland Garros round of 64 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 4-6 6-4 6-4 Gail Sherriff Match data Jun 1, 1978* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 — — — — — — —
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.