H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 3-2

Gail Sherriff holds a 3–2 lead over Katja Ebbinghaus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 3–1 on clay, while Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1976 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Katja Ebbinghaus
Age 78

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 1976* Monte Carlo WTA 250 R16 Clay Gail Sherriff 6-1 6-2 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data
Apr 10, 1976* Nice WTA 250 QF Clay Gail Sherriff 7-5 7-6 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data
Apr 1, 1973* New York WTA 250 R16 Carpet Katja Ebbinghaus 6-1 6-2 Gail Sherriff Match data
May 30, 1972* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Katja Ebbinghaus 6-3 4-6 6-2 Gail Sherriff Match data
Mar 8, 1972* Cairo WTA 250 SF Clay Gail Sherriff 8-6 5-7 6-2 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,978 342 145 70.2% 0 0 0 0 41 41
Katja Ebbinghaus — — — 1,873 173 143 54.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Katja Ebbinghaus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1968 4–6 40.0% — 1,494 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1969 10–9 52.6% — 1,557 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1970 4–5 44.4% — 1,575 0 0
23 1968 65–14 82.3% — 1,847 0 13 1971 9–9 50.0% — 1,590 0 0
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,800 0 17 1972 22–11 66.7% — 1,799 0 2
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,933 0 21 1973 14–13 51.9% — 1,773 0 2
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,921 0 23 1974 18–17 51.4% — 1,750 0 2
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,860 0 28 1975 19–14 57.6% — 1,827 0 2
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,758 0 28 1976 10–9 52.6% — 1,757 0 2
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,877 0 34 1977 26–14 65.0% — 1,814 0 4
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,833 0 38 1978 6–16 27.3% — 1,686 0 4
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,793 0 38 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,650 0 4
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,755 0 38 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,710 0 5
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,772 0 39 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,639 0 6
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,721 0 39 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,652 0 6
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,704 0 40 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,711 0 41 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,701 0 41 — — — — — — —