H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Kerry Reid H2H: 1-4
Kerry Reid holds a 4–1 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kerry Reid leads 4–0 on grass, while Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kerry Reid won the 1977 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 81
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 78
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1977* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Kerry Reid | 6-1 6-1 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1972* | Bristol | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Kerry Reid | 6-1 6-2 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1971* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 7-6 6-3 | Kerry Reid | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1968* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Kerry Reid | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1968* | Auckland Wills Intl | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Kerry Reid | 8-6 6-1 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Kerry Reid | — | — | — | 2,215 | 586 | 245 | 70.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Kerry Reid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 66–22 | 75.0% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 77–26 | 74.8% | — | 2,003 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1971 | 55–27 | 67.1% | — | 2,154 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1972 | 59–25 | 70.2% | — | 2,031 | 0 | 16 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1973 | 63–23 | 73.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 17 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1974 | 52–14 | 78.8% | — | 2,208 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 2,054 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | 1976 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,072 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | 1977 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 20 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | 1978 | 53–25 | 67.9% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 21 |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | 1979 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,022 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,984 | 1 | 22 |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 22 |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,954 | 1 | 22 |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 22 |